<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swaim&#039;s Panacea &#8211; part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thequackdoctor.com/index.php/swaims-panacea-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thequackdoctor.com/index.php/swaims-panacea-part-2/</link>
	<description>Panacean powders, pills, potions and pamphlets, as advertised in historical newspapers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:34:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Rance</title>
		<link>http://thequackdoctor.com/index.php/swaims-panacea-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Rance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackdoctor.wordpress.com/?p=2060#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jane!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jane!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Le Galloudec</title>
		<link>http://thequackdoctor.com/index.php/swaims-panacea-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Le Galloudec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackdoctor.wordpress.com/?p=2060#comment-126</guid>
		<description>I very much enjoyed my visit to your site.  as the last commentator but one said, not much has changed at all! Actually I find that comforting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much enjoyed my visit to your site.  as the last commentator but one said, not much has changed at all! Actually I find that comforting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Rance</title>
		<link>http://thequackdoctor.com/index.php/swaims-panacea-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Rance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackdoctor.wordpress.com/?p=2060#comment-125</guid>
		<description>I second that! Thanks for visiting and for your kind comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that! Thanks for visiting and for your kind comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twaza</title>
		<link>http://thequackdoctor.com/index.php/swaims-panacea-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>twaza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackdoctor.wordpress.com/?p=2060#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I have just discovered your blog --- a wonderful and fascinating resource.

The advertisements are a welcome reminder that not much, other than the style of language, has changed in human nature over the centuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just discovered your blog &#8212; a wonderful and fascinating resource.</p>
<p>The advertisements are a welcome reminder that not much, other than the style of language, has changed in human nature over the centuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Rance</title>
		<link>http://thequackdoctor.com/index.php/swaims-panacea-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Rance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackdoctor.wordpress.com/?p=2060#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think they were a bit embarrassed, especially as some of them had based their endorsements on just one or two patients.

I find the uneasy relationship between the faculty and nostrum vendors interesting, though, because the Panacea wasn&#039;t that different from things commonly prescribed by qualified doctors at the time. There was a rather fine line between quackery and orthodox practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think they were a bit embarrassed, especially as some of them had based their endorsements on just one or two patients.</p>
<p>I find the uneasy relationship between the faculty and nostrum vendors interesting, though, because the Panacea wasn&#8217;t that different from things commonly prescribed by qualified doctors at the time. There was a rather fine line between quackery and orthodox practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thegentlemanadministrator</title>
		<link>http://thequackdoctor.com/index.php/swaims-panacea-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>thegentlemanadministrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackdoctor.wordpress.com/?p=2060#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Fascinating article &amp; great illustrations. These Panaceas seem comical in a way now but how many people did they kill, no wonder the doctors wanted their endorsments removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating article &amp; great illustrations. These Panaceas seem comical in a way now but how many people did they kill, no wonder the doctors wanted their endorsments removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

